1/ Context
In order to have the best eco-credentials, the majority of companies are today compelled to promote their products as sustainable : “eco-friendly t-shirt”, “responsible product”, “100% recycled fabrics” – without having to provide any evidence for these often deceptive claims. As a result, whether it be multinationals or small businesses, an increasing number of reputable companies are accused of “greenwashing” by advertising their products as green despite their activities causing significant environmental harm.
2/ What happened?
While the European Union and most Member States did have consumer laws in place to sanction misleading marketing practices, there lacked both preventative mechanisms to regulate the use of environmental claims specifically as well as per se prohibitions of certain conducts. Consequently, the European Commission established in March a proposal for a Directive amending current consumer rights directives at the EU level (Directives 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU).
On the 17th of January 2024, the Parliament adopted a favorable position at first reading and instructed the President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments so they may also endorse the Directive.
While the Directive includes provisions relating to the repairability of products or the obsolescence of goods, the primary aim of the Directive remains to fight “misleading environmental claims” in the absence of binding international law on this issue.
3/ Significance
The Directive is the first of its kind. It allows consumers to make informed purchasing decisions and avoid unfounded and potentially misleading claims regarding the sustainability of products.
To do this, the Directive introduces two commercial activities to the catalog of practices deemed deceptive if they induce or are apt to induce the typical consumer to make a transactional choice they otherwise wouldn’t have made:
- Promoting an ecological assertion concerning the forthcoming environmental efficiency lacking transparent, objective, and openly accessible and confirmable commitments outlined in a comprehensive and practical execution strategy, comprising quantifiable and time-bound objectives and other pertinent components essential to bolster its execution (such as resource allocation) and subject to regular verification by an impartial third-party specialist, whose conclusions are disclosed to consumers to prevent ‘auto-verification’.
- Publicizing advantages to consumers that are immaterial and do not stem from any aspect of the product or service.
It also prohibits certain activities not on a case by case basis but in all circumstances. These include:
- Making an environmental claim about the entire product or the trader’s entire business when it concerns only a certain aspect of the product or a specific activity of the trader’s business.
- Presenting a sustainability label lacking certification or endorsement from public entities.
- Asserting a vague environmental statement without evidence of substantial environmental achievements aligned with the claim.
- Alleging environmental neutrality, reduction, or positivity based on greenhouse gas emissions offsetting without sufficient substantiation.
4/ What’s next?